美國制造商在全球價值鏈中不斷變化的公司和國家邊界 The Changing Firm and Country Boundaries of US Manufacturers in Global Value Chains_第1頁
美國制造商在全球價值鏈中不斷變化的公司和國家邊界 The Changing Firm and Country Boundaries of US Manufacturers in Global Value Chains_第2頁
美國制造商在全球價值鏈中不斷變化的公司和國家邊界 The Changing Firm and Country Boundaries of US Manufacturers in Global Value Chains_第3頁
美國制造商在全球價值鏈中不斷變化的公司和國家邊界 The Changing Firm and Country Boundaries of US Manufacturers in Global Value Chains_第4頁
美國制造商在全球價值鏈中不斷變化的公司和國家邊界 The Changing Firm and Country Boundaries of US Manufacturers in Global Value Chains_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩48頁未讀 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領

文檔簡介

NBERWORKINGPAPERSERIES

THECHANGINGFIRMANDCOUNTRYBOUNDARIESOFUSMANUFACTURERSINGLOBALVALUECHAINS

TeresaC.Fort

WorkingPaper31319

/papers/w31319

NATIONALBUREAUOFECONOMICRESEARCH

1050MassachusettsAvenue

Cambridge,MA02138

June2023

AnyviewsexpressedarethoseoftheauthorandnotthoseoftheUSCensusBureau,theBureauofEconomicAnalysis,theNationalBureauofEconomicResearch,ortheCentreforEconomicPolicyResearch.TheCensusBureauandtheBureauofEconomicAnalysishavereviewedthisdataproducttoensureappropriateaccess,use,anddisclosureavoidanceprotectionoftheconfidentialsourcedatausedtoproducethisproduct.ThisresearchwasperformedataFederalStatisticalResearchDataCenterunderFSRDCProjectNumber1975(CBDRB-FY23-P1975-R10185),CESProject1530(releaseon7/15/2019),andCESProject6907751(BEA-FY23-P6907751-R2).JackLiangprovidedexceptionalresearchassistance.IthankPolAntràs,JimFetzer,FarihaKamal,PeterSchott,andChadSyversonforveryhelpfulcomments.Ialsothanktheeditors,ErikHurst,NinaPavcnik,HeidiWilliams,andespeciallyTimTaylorforinvaluableinsights,comments,andsuggestions.

NBERworkingpapersarecirculatedfordiscussionandcommentpurposes.Theyhavenotbeenpeer-reviewedorbeensubjecttothereviewbytheNBERBoardofDirectorsthataccompaniesofficialNBERpublications.

?2023byTeresaC.Fort.Allrightsreserved.Shortsectionsoftext,nottoexceedtwoparagraphs,maybequotedwithoutexplicitpermissionprovidedthatfullcredit,including?notice,isgiventothesource.

TheChangingFirmandCountryBoundariesofUSManufacturersinGlobalValueChains

TeresaC.Fort

NBERWorkingPaperNo.31319

June2023

JELNo.F1,L2,L6

ABSTRACT

ThispaperdocumentshowUSfirmsorganizegoodsproductionacrossfirmandcountryboundaries.MostUSfirmsthatperformphysicaltransformationtasksin-houseusingforeignmanufacturingplantsin2007alsoownUSmanufacturingplants;moreovermanufacturingcomprisestheirmaindomesticactivity.Bycontrast,“factorylessgoodsproducers”outsourceallphysicaltransformationtaskstoarm's-lengthcontractors,focusingtheirin-houseeffortsondesignandmarketing.Thisdistinctfirmtypeismissingfromstandardanalysesofmanufacturing,growinginimportance,andincreasinglyreliantonforeignsuppliers.Physicaltransformation“within-the-firm”thuscoincideswithsubstantialphysicaltransformation“within-the-country,”whereasitsperformance“outside-the-firm”oftenalsoimplies“outside-the-country.”Despitethesedifferences,factorylessgoodsproducersandfirmswithforeignanddomesticmanufacturingplantsbothemployrelativelyhighsharesofUSknowledgeworkers.Thesepatternscallfornewmodelsanddatatocapturethepotentialforforeignproductiontosupportdomesticinnovation,whichUSfirmsleveragearoundtheworld.

TeresaC.Fort

TuckSchoolofBusiness

DartmouthCollege

100TuckHall

Hanover,NH03755

andCEPR

andalsoNBER

teresa.fort@

Adataappendixisavailableat/data-appendix/w31319

1Introduction

TherearetwomainconcernsaboutUSmanufacturingandglobalization:thelossofUSjobstoforeignplacesandthelossofaUSknowledgebaseconnectedtomanufacturing.Inthispaper,IdocumentthefullrangeofUSmanufacturing?rms’domesticandglobaloperations,providingabroadercontextfortheseconcerns.

Myperspectiveemphasizesthatmanufacturinginvolvesthreemajorstages:1)productdesignandinnovation;2)aseriesofphysicaltransformationactivities,suchasmakinginputsandassemblingthem;and3)sales,marketing,anddistribution.Mosttrademodelsimplicitly(orevenexplicitly)includeallthreestages,butgovernmentstatisticsonlyclassifyphysicaltransformationtasksasman-ufacturing.Thismismatchfromtheorytodatawasnotproblematicwhenallthreestageswereperformedinsideaparticular?rmandcountry.However,dramaticimprovementsininformationandcommunicationtechnologyhavemadeitincreasinglypossibletofragmentthesestagesacrossmultiplecountriesand?rms.Thisfragmentationhasmademeasuringthecompleteproductionprocessformanufacturedgoodsdi?cult(orevenimpossible)withtraditionaldatasets.

Figure

1

illustratesa?rm’schoicestofragmentproductionacrosscountriesand?rms,buildingonadiagramintroducedby

Feenstra

(

2010

).Thehorizontalaxiscapturesthe?rmboundarydecisionforphysicaltransformationtasks:the?rmmay“outsource”taskstoother?rms,ormaintainintegratedproduction.Theverticalaxiscapturesthe?rm’slocationchoiceforthesetasks:the?rmmay“o?shore”bylocatingproductioninoneormoreforeigncountries,orproducedomestically.

AUS?rmwithmanufacturingplantsintheUnitedStatesnecessarilyoccupiesquadrant1,sinceitperformsphysicaltransformationtasksin-house.A?rmthatownsforeignmanufacturingplantsoccupiesquadrant3.However,asingle?rmmayoccupymultiplequadrants.Forexample,considerTexasInstruments,aUSsemiconductormanufacturerthatownsandoperatesmultiplewaferfabsintheUnitedStates,alongwith11otherproductionsitesinMexico,Europe,andAsia.TheFordMotorCompanyhas30manufacturingplants,20ofwhichareinforeigncountries.Sincethese?rmsmanufacturein-houseintheUnitedStatesandabroad,theyspanquadrants1and3.BothTexasInstrumentsandFordalsoworkextensivelywitharm’s-lengthpartners,suchthattheyalsospanquadrants2and4,thuscoveringtheentirematrix.

1

Incontrastto?rmsthatperformphysicaltransformationtasksin-house,a“factorylessgoodsproducer”isa?rmthatcontractsforallofitsphysicaltransformationactivities,andassuchoccu-piesonlyquadrants2and/or4,dependingonwhetheritssuppliersaredomestic,foreign,orboth.Forexample,Appleisdeeplyinvolvedinmanufacturingphysicalgoods,butdoessoviathird-partycontractmanufacturingsuppliersprimarilyinforeigncountries.Similarly,Nikereports640manu-facturinglocationsacross38countries,allofwhichinvolveoutsourcedrelationshipswithcontractmanufacturers.Qualcommisoneofmany“fabless”semiconductor?rmsthatdesignchipsandrelyonpredominantlyKoreanandTaiwanesecontractmanufacturersfortheirproduction;indeed,

Ba-

1See/about-ti/company/ti-at-a-glance/manufacturing.htmlforTIplants,https://

/about-ti/suppliers/supplier-portal.html?keyMatch=SUPPLIERSforTIsupplierportal,https://

/operations/locations/global-plants.html

forFordplants,and

https://fsp.portal.

/web/portal

fortheFordSupplierPortal.

1

2

Taskperformedinhome(HQ)country

O

u

t

s

o

u

r

c

i

n

g

Taskperformedinforeigncountry

yardetal

.(

2015

)attribute25percentofglobalsemiconductorsalesin2012tosuchfactorylessgoodsproducers.

2

Itisworthclarifyingthatfragmentingproductiondoesnotjustrefertopurchasinginputs.Forexample,aBelgiancandy-maker’simportsofchocolatearegenerallynotconsideredfragmentedpro-ductioninstudiesonoutsourcingando?shoring.Instead,fragmentedproductionentailsasplittingapartoftheproductionprocessbya?rmthatusedto,orcouldreasonablyhave,producedthefragmentedpart.

Figure1:Firmintegrationandlocationdecisionsforphysicaltransformationtasks

TaskperformedwithinthefirmTaskoutsourcedtoanotherfirm

Domestic

In-houseProduction

(Q1)

FordMotor

Domestic

Outsourcing

(Q2)

Company

Qualcomm

Foreign

Outsourcing

oring”

(Q4)

ForeignDirect

Investment

(Q3)

“Offsh

Source:This?gurebuildsontheframeworkpresentedin

Feenstra

(2010

).Itdepictsthe?rm(horizontalaxis)andcountry(verticalaxis)boundarydecisionsmadeby?rmsinvolvedinthebroadermanufacturingprocessforthestage2,physicaltransformationtasksrequiredtomanufacturegoods.

Firmswithnodomesticmanufacturingplantshavenoactivityinquadrant1.Theytendtobemissingfromresearchonproductionfragmentationando?shoring,becausethereisnoclearwayinstandarddatasetstoidentifytheirdirectinvolvementinmanufacturing.Inthepaper,Ibeginbydescribingthelimitationsofstandarddatasetsinidentifyingsuch?rms.IthenexploittwonovelUSdatasourcestoidentifytwoorganizationalformsmissingfrommanyanalysesonglobalvaluechains:US?rmsthatperformphysicaltransformationtaskswithinthe?rmboundaryusingexclu-sivelyforeignmanufacturingplants,andfactorylessgoodsproducersthatoutsourcealltheirphysicaltransformationtaskstoarm’s-lengthcontractmanufacturers.

ContrarytothefearthatUSmultinationalshaveo?shoredmostoftheirjobs,I?ndthatthevastmajorityofUS?rmsthatownforeignmanufacturingplantsin2007alsomaintaindomesticproduction;moreover,manufacturingcomprisestheirprimarydomesticactivity.Contrarytothefearthatparticipationinglobalvaluechainsentailsalossoftechnologicalskills,I?ndthat?rms

2ForApple,see

/articles/BL-DGB-25630

;forNike,see

https://manufacturingmap

.

/#

;andforQualcomm,see

/company/corporate-responsibility/

acting-responsibly/sustainable-product-design/supply-chain

.

3

withglobalin-housemanufacturingplantsandfactorylessgoodsproducersbothemployrelativelyhighsharesofUS‘knowledge’workers.Indeed,multinationalenterprisesthatmanufacturegoodsaredisproportionatecontributorstoR&Dandpatenting,andfactorylessgoodsproducersarefarmorelikelytodesigngoodsthanother?rmsintheirsector,andhavealsobeenlinkedtogreaterR&D,patenting,andtrademarks(

Kamal

,

2020

).

AcompletepictureofUS?rms’involvementinglobalvaluechainsisnecessarytounderstandthee?ectsofglobalization.Takeforexample

Bermanetal.

(

1994

),whoruledouttradeasanexplanationfortheshifttowardsnon-productionworkersinUSmanufacturingplantsduringthe1980sand1990sbecausethosechangesoccurredinsomeofthesameindustrieswithsurgingimports,notablycomputerandelectronics.TheyreasonedthatatradeexplanationmustentailreallocationacrossindustriesconsistentwithUScomparativeadvantage,whereaswithin-industryadjustmentsdominatedinthedata.Wenowknow,however,thatcomputerandelectronicmanufacturingisoneofthe?rstindustriesinwhichfactorylessgoodproductionarose,assome?rmsfocusedoninnovationandshiftedphysicalproductiontoforeignsuppliers.Itisnotablethatcomputerandelectronicsalsoaccountsforthegreatestgrowthinbreakthroughpatentsoverthelasttwodecades(

Kellyetal

.,

2021

)andthemajorityofrealvalueaddedgrowthinUSmanufacturingfrom1992to2011,evenasimportsofcomputersandelectronicssurged(

Fortetal.

,

2017

).

Iconcludewithadiscussiononhowtradestatisticsandtheoryneedtoexpandtocapturetherealitiesofgoodsproductionacross?rmandcountryboundaries.Theseactivitiesa?ectourunder-standingoftradeandforeigndirectinvestment,aswellasaggregatemeasuresofdomesticvalueaddedandGDP.Thepotentialimplicationsarefar-reaching:increasedspecializationwithintheproductionofaparticularindustryorgoodprovidesadditionalgainsfromtrade(

JonesandKierzkowski

,

2001

).Whensuchspecializationentailsreallocationintoearlyproductionstages,suchasdesignandinno-vation,o?shoringcanevenleadtodynamicgains,asthereturnstoinnovationrise,inducinggrowthinR&Dandideasthatbegetmoreideas(

GrossmanandHelpman

,

1991

;

Rodr′?guez-Clare

,

2010

).

2MeasuringtheRangeofManufacturers’OrganizationalForms

Thetraditionaldataonmanufacturing?rmscollectedbyUSstatisticalagenciesmakeitdi?culttocapture?rmsthatareinvolvedinthemanufacturingprocesseitherbyproducinggoodsexclusivelyoutsidetheUnitedStates,exclusivelyoutsidetheir?rmboundariesviacontracts,orboth.IreviewtheexistingdataonUSestablishmentsand?rms,oninternationaltradeby?rms,andonmultinational?rms,explainingthebene?tsandlimitationsofeachdatasource.

2.1StandardMeasuresofUSEstablishmentsandFirms

TheCensusBureaude?nesan“establishment”asaphysicallocationatwhichemploymentandpayrollrecordsarekept.A?rmcanthushavemultipleestablishments–andtheseestablishmentsneednotbeclassi?edinthesameindustry.

TheUSCensusBureauconstructstheLongitudinalBusinessDatabase,whichisacomprehensive,establishment-leveldatasetofallprivate,non-farmemployerestablishmentsfrom1976to2019.The

4

datasetprovidesemployment,payroll,location,andauniqueindustrycodefortheprimaryactivityofeveryestablishment(see

JarminandMiranda

,

2002

;

Chowetal.

,

2021

,fordetails).Allemployeesofanestablishmentareassignedtoitsindustry.Thedataalsoidentifythe?rmtowhicheachestablishmentbelongs,makingitpossibletomeasurethefullrangeofa?rm’sactivitiesacrossindustriesandsectors.

TheLongitudinalBusinessDatabasecanbemergedtotheEconomicCensuses,whicharecollectedinyearsthatendin2or7.Thesecensusescontaindetailedinformationonestablishmentsales,inputuse,andothersector-speci?cmetrics,suchastechnology.

Anestablishment’sindustryistheprimarymeansthatgovernmentagenciesandresearchersusetoidentifymanufacturingactivity.USstatisticalagenciesusetheNorthAmericanIndustryClassi-?cationSystem,commonlyreferredtoasNAICS(anddescribedat/naics)toclassifyestablishments.TheguidingprincipleofNAICSistoassignanindustrycodetoanes-tablishmentbasedonthemainactivitiesperformedbyitsemployees.Bycontrast,theStandardIndustrialClassi?cationSystem(SIC)classi?edestablishmentsthatprovidedsupportservicesforotherestablishmentsoftheir?rmtothoseestablishments’industry.Forexample,anR&DlabisalwaysinServicesunderNAICS,butwouldhavebeenclassi?edinmanufacturingunderSICifitsR&Dwastosupportthe?rm’smanufacturingplants.USCensusdatatransitionedfromNAICStoSICbetween1997to2002,aperiodthatcoincideswithChina’sentrytotheWorldTradeOrganiza-tion,makingthisissueparticularlyrelevantforresearchonglobalization.ThecurrentLongitudinalBusinessDatabasenowincludesthemostrecentvintageofNAICScodesforeveryestablishmentovertheentireperiodusingthemethodsdevelopedin

FortandKlimek

(

2018

).

Factorylessgoodsproducersarehardtoidentifywiththesedata.Tobeclassi?edinmanufactur-ing,anestablishmentmustperform‘mechanical,physical,orchemicaltransformationofmaterialsorcomponentsintonewproducts’.Asaresult,anestablishmentthatcontractsformanufacturingserviceswillgenerallybeclassi?edinnon-manufacturingsectors,suchaswholesaletrade.

3

Similarly,establishmentsthatperformsupportactivitiesformanufacturing,suchasanR&DlaboranEngineer-ingservicesestablishmentareclassi?edinservices.Giventheongoingfragmentationofdesignandproduction,weneedwaystoidentifyestablishmentsand?rmsinvolvedinthebroadermanufacturingprocess.

2.2MerchandiseTradeDatabyFirm

Startingin1992,theCensus?rmdatacanbemergedto?rm-leveldatafromUSCustomsthatrecordtheuniverseoftradetransactionsabove$2,500ofmerchandisegoodsthatenterorleavetheUnitedStates.ThisLongitudinalFirmTradeTransactionsDatabase(LFTTD)providesdetailedinformationontheproductsshipped,aswellasthesource(forimports)ordestination(forexports).Thesedatawere?rstlinkedby

Bernardetal.

(

2009

);

KamalandOuyang

(

2020

)providedetailsonthelatestlinkinge?orts.

OneuniquefeatureoftheseUStradedataisthattheycontainanidenti?erfortransactions

3ForanexplanationfromtheCensusBureau,see

/naics/?input=31&year=2022&details=

31

.Anexceptionis‘jobbers’incertainapparelmanufacturingindustries.Theseestablishmentsperformthe‘en-trepreneurialfunctionsinvolvedinapparelmanufacturing,’butcontractforthetransformationactivitiesfromother?rms.

5

betweenrelatedparties.Exporttransactionsinwhichoneofthepartieshasatleast10percentownershipoftheotherparty,orimportsbetweenpartieswitha5percentownershipthresholdare?aggedas“related-party”transactions.

4

Thus,arm’s-lengthtradecanbedistinguishedfrom?owsbetweenrelatedparties.However,forthepresentpurposeofstudyingwhetherUS?rmshavein-tegratedmanufacturingplantsinforeigncountries,thesedatahavewell-knownshortcomings;theyhavenoinformationonactivitiesofa?liatesofmultinationalenterprises;theydonotdistinguishUSmultinationalenterprisesfromforeign-owned?rms;andtheyarebasedonverylowownershipthresholds.

2.3MultinationalFirmsintheUnitedStates

TheUSBureauofEconomicAnalysiscarriesouttheAnnualSurveyofUSDirectInvestmentAbroad,knownasBE-11,whichprovidesinformationonallUS-based?rms’outwardforeigna?liateemploy-ment,localsales,salesbacktotheUnitedStates(andwhethertheseareintra-?rm),andsalestothirdmarkets,bythea?liatecountryandindustry.Thissurveythuscapturesoutwardforeigndirectinvestmentinformation.TheBureauofEconomicAnalysisalsocarriesouttheBenchmarkSurveyofForeignDirectInvestmentintheUnitedStates,knownasBE-12,whichisconductedevery?veyearsandprovidesinwardforeigndirectinvestment.Thissurveymakesitpossibletoidentifyforeign-owned?rmsoperatingintheUnitedStates.

For2007,theyearofmyanalysis,thesetwosurveysprovidethemostdetailedandcomprehensiveinformationavailableaboutmultinational?rmsoperatingintheUnitedStates.IncontrasttotheCensusBureau’srelated-partytradedata,thesedataincludeshare-of-ownershipinformation,aswellasforeigna?liates’industries,andtheirlocal,US,andthird-marketsales.

Despitetheiradvantages,thesedataalonearenotsu?cienttostudythefullrangeofUS?rms’manufacturingactivities.First,thesedataonlyincludemultinationalssothereisnoinformationondomesticmanufacturers.Second,theyarereportedatthe?rmlevel,andthereforedonotcontaintheestablishment-levelinformationnecessarytoanalyzethefullrangeof?rms’domesticestablishments.Finally,thedatalackcountryandproduct-levelinformationontheuniverseof?rms’importsandexports.

Inthenextsection,Icombinethe2007USCensusBureauandBureauofEconomicAnalysisdatadescribedheretoidentifyallUS?rmswithintegratedmanufacturingplantsanywhereintheworld.Suchananalysisensurescoverageofall?rmswithanyactivityinquadrants1or3ofFigure

1

.Inthesubsequentsection,Iexploitdetailedquestionsfromthe2017EconomicCensusofWholesaleTradetoidentify?rmsthatareinvolvedinthebroadermanufacturingprocessbycontractingforproductionfromarm-s-lengthsuppliers,thuscapturing?rmsspecializedinquadrants2and/or4.

3CountryBoundariesofIntegratedUSManufacturers

Inthissection,IfocusonUS?rmsthataredirectlyinvolvedinmanufacturingbecausetheyhavemajority-ownershipsharesinmanufacturingplantsintheUnitedStates,inforeigncountries,orboth.

4Related-partyimportsmayincludeotherrelationships,see

KamalandOuyang

(2020

)fordetails.

6

Assuch,these?rmsnecessarilyoccupyquadrants1or3ofFigure

1

.Inthenextsection,IturntofactorylessgoodsproducerssuchasAppleandNike.

3.1NovelDataonallIn-houseManufacturingbyUSFirms

Iusenewdatamergedandanalyzedby

Kamaletal.

(

2022

)and

Antr`asetal.

(

2023

)toprovideacompletepictureofUS?rmsthatperformphysicaltransformationtasksin-houseanywhereintheworld.Akeycontributionofmyanalysisistoinclude?rmswithnodomesticmanufacturingplants,whicharemissingfromstudiesusingtraditionaldatasets.Imeasure?rms’employment,sales,andtradeactivityacrosssectorsbylinkingthe2007LongitudinalBusinessDatabase,EconomicCensuses,andLongitudinalFirmTradeTransactionsDatabase(excludingtradeofminerals,fuels,andoil(HS27)).IidentifymultinationalenterprisesasallUS?rmswithmajority-ownedforeigna?liatesusingthe“outward”foreigndirectinvestmentsurvey.Iusethe“inward”surveytoremoveallUSestablishmentsthataremajority-ownedbyaforeign?rm.

In2007,thereare243,700US?rmsthatownmanufacturingplantssomewhereintheworld(about5.6percentofall?rms),whichaccountfor88percentoftotalUSmanufacturingemployment(foreignmultinationalenterprisesemploytheremainder),20percentoftotalemployment,and29percentoftotalsales.These?rmsmediate42percentofUSimportsand58percentofexports,whichhighlightsthedisproportionateinvolvementofgoods-producing?rmsininternationaltrade.AppendixTableA.1providesamoredetaileddecompositionofthesestatistics.

3.2Domesticversuso?shoredintegratedmanufacturing

AcommonperceptionisthatUSmultinationalenterpriseshaverelocatedthebulkoftheirmanu-facturingplantso?shore.Toevaluatethisclaim,IusethenewdatatocategorizeallUS?rmswithmajority-ownedmanufacturingplantsanywhereintheworldintofourcategories:1)domesticman-ufacturing?rmswithoutanymajority-ownedforeigna?liates;2)USmultinationalenterprisesthathaveonlyUSmanufacturingplants(theirforeigna?liatesareoutsidemanufacturing);3)USmulti-nationalenterprisesthathavebothUSandforeignmanufacturingplants;and4)USmultinationalenterprisesthathaveonlyforeignmanufacturingplants.(Allthese?rmtypesmayalsooutsourcesometasksfromdomesticorforeignsuppliers.)

The?rstrowofTable

1

presentsthenumberofUS?rmsthatmanufacturein-housein2007acrossthesefourcategories.Ofthe243,700USmanufacturing?rms,only1,700havemajority-ownedforeignestablishments(columns2to4).Amongthesemultinationals,1,200?rmsownUSandforeignmanufacturingplants,versus350?rmswithjustdomesticplants,andonly150?rmswithexclusivelyforeignin-housemanufacturing.FirmswithbothdomesticandforeignmanufacturingplantsarethusthemostprevalenttypeofUSmultinationalmanufacturingenterprise.

PanelAofTable

1

presenttotalsalesforthese?rms.The?rstrowcontainsglobalsales,whicharethesumof?rms’USandforeign-establishmentsales,eachofwhichispresentedseparatelyinthenexttworows.Iinclude?rms’totalsaleshere,regardlessofwhethertheyarebookedbymanufacturingornon-manufacturingestablishments.

Thesalesdatadelivertwostarkmessages.First,US?rmswithbothdomesticandforeignmanu-

7

Table1:Sales,employment,andtrade?owsforallUS?rmsthatmanufacturein-house

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

FirmType:

Domestic

MNE

MNE

MNE

Majority-OwnedManufacturingPlantsIn:

USOnly

USOnly

US&Foreign

ForeignOnly

Firms

242,000

350

1,200

150

PanelA:Sales($billions)

GlobalSales

2,629

1,695

6,710

345

SalesbyUSEstabs

2,629

1,446

3,853

173

SalesbyForeignEstabs

-

249

2,857

172

PanelB:Employment(thousands)

GlobalEmployment

11,059

5,338

11,883

732

EmploymentinUSEstabs

11,059

4,349

6,556

361

EmploymentinForeignEstabs

-

989

5,327

371

PanelC:USTradeFlows($billions)

Imports

126

39

410

12

Arm’s-Length

89

33

160

6

Related-Party

37

7

250

6

Exports

123

22

437

3

Arm’s-Length

103

16

253

2

Related-Party

19

5

184

1

Source:2007LongitudinalBusinessDatabase,EconomicCensuses,LongitudinalFirmTradeTransactionsDatabase,BEAinwardandoutwardsurveys.Tablepresentstotalnumberof?rmsandtheirglobalsales,globalemployment,andUSmerchandisegoodtrade?owsby?rmtypeandmanufacturingplantlocations.SampleisallUS?rmswithoneormoremajority-ownedmanufacturingplantsanywhereintheworld.

8

facturingplantsdominatebothglobalandUSsales,withglobalsalesof$6.7trillion–morethantheotherthreecategoriescombined–despitethefactthattheyareonly1,200outofthe243,700?rmsinthesample.Second,USmanufacturersthatonlyproducein-houseinforeignplantsaccountforamere3percentUSmanufacturers’globalsales.

Thedominanceof?rmswithbothUSandforeignin-houseproductionisreinforcedby?rms’employmentdi?erences.PanelBshowsthattransnationalmanufacturers–thosethatperformin-housephys

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論